Where is the outrage?
"The Justice Department was successful in obtaining an injunction that prohibits the defendant who brandished a weapon outside a Philadelphia polling place from doing so again…” So what does that mean? Did he promise never to show a weapon outside of a polling place again as long as Obama is in office?
I cannot believe the administration of HOPE and CHANGE and (excuse me while I puke in my mouth), TRANSPARENCY is dropping charges against visible and undeniable violations of the law by these idiots.
www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2009/05/29/charges-black-panthers-dropped-obama/
Posted on May 29th, 2009 by Bouhammer
Filed under: Executive Branch, Judicial Branch, The US Constitution, Wall of Shame
Interesting story, Troy. Since I can’t find any objective reporting on this issue, its hard to decide. We have Fox (Fabricated and Bull*&^%) and the NBP’s website itself – http://www.newblackpanther.com/statement-voterintimidation_phillychapter.html
My guess is that its hard to prove intimidation and the government would have lost.
NY-David
Considering they had video of the incident, I would say proving it would have been easy. That’s all it would have taken was a few people to come forward and say they were intimidated. Looks like another one of Obama’s goons got away with breaking the law. Just as Acorn is doing. Obama doesn’t belong in office, all of his faux pas prove that. History will not be kind to him.